Clicky

On VIP Breakdown: Are Glee’s Finn and Rachel Dating in Real Life?

We’re giving away a limited edition Modern Warfare 2 Xbox 360 bundle!

We are kicking off our holiday giveaways with a bang! We’ve teamed with our friends at shoot it! to bring you this Modern Warfare 2 Xbox 360 limited edition console, a $400 value. The bundle includes a custom Xbox 360 console with exclusive design, a 250GB Xbox 360 hard drive, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, a pair of black controllers, and more. It hits stores on November 10th, and we’ve pre-ordered one that we’re giving away to one of you. Be sure to check out the giveaway rules to see how to enter!

Latest Video: FilmCrunch 067: Hairspray, Chuck & Larry, Premonition reviewed

Veronica Santiago and Neil Estep review Hairspray, Chuck & Larry, and Premonition in this episode of FilmCrunch.
Play Video
Close Player   Episode Permalink Comment on this Video Subscribe to this show via iTunes, Miro, or RSS Download for: iPod High Definition
Friday May 8, 2009 6:23 pm

Movie Review: Star Trek (2009)

Share

Posted by David Torres Categories: Paramount, Science Fiction

StarTrek

Rating: *** 1/2 stars

(Warning: The following review contains some spoilers.)

The world of in crisis! No, it’s not on the verge of dying due to the release of this film. Instead it’s on the verge of going in a whole new direction. In the 1980s, DC Comics published a mini-series entitled “Crisis on Infinite Earths”. If you are a comic book fan, you are aware of this series and know that it was written in order to say goodbye to DC’s old continuity and create an entirely new one. A new world was born. New stories were able to be told because the previous “universe” no longer existed. That is what has happened to the world of Star Trek.

In this film, there is a Romulan named Nero. Nero and his crew travel back in time and as a result create a new timeline. If you are a Trekker, I’m sure you remember the Star Trek: The Next Generation (TNG) episode entitled “Yesterdays Enterprise” in which the Enterprise C traveled into the future and created a new timeline. The timeline was later corrected and everything was back to normal, but that will not be the case here.

Star Trek as a franchise was certainly in a crisis prior to the release of this film. With the two previous Trek films received poorly by both fans and critics as well as the demise of the series “Enterprise” Star Trek looked dead. Many people felt that Star Trek should stay low for a while and maybe come back much later with an attempt at reviving the series. Paramount said no and went with and his crew and they have succeeded. This film was great. Tons of action; humor; heart breaking moments. I really enjoyed this film both as a fan of the franchise and as a movie on its own.


When Paramount Pictures announced that this film would be featuring the original Trek characters with an entirely new cast of actors, I welcomed the idea, but I was worried about who would fill the shoes of the original actors. I think Abrams and company were successful here. who plays James Kirk does not channel William Shatner’s performance and makes the role his own. Zachary Quinto I also believe made the role his own and didn’t try to be Leonard Nimoy’s Spock.

Two actors who did channel the performances of their predecessors are ironically the two characters whose predecessors are deceased. Karl Urban’s Dr. McCoy and ‘s Scotty resurrect the spirits of DeForest Kelley and James Doohan. Urban looks like a young McCoy and is able to dothe same little quirks we all loved from Kelley’s performance. Pegg does not look like James Doohan, but he sure as hell sounds like him. Pegg comes in half way through the film and leaves you wishing he came in sooner.

John Cho plays a much more bad ass Hikaru Sulu and Anton Yelchin does a good job as Chekov although his accent is a little too much and over the top.

Leonard Nimoy also stars as Spock from the future or should I say Spock from the previous timeline.  He provides some great moments interacting with a young James Kirk as well as a young version of himself.  If there is a weak link in the cast I would say it’s ‘s Nero.  Bana does a good job in the role, but I felt the script really didn’t give him much to work with and didn’t flesh out his character well enough.  I wasn’t really cheering for the crew to defeat him the way I cheered when Kirk beat the Klingons in the old series.

The film ends on a high note and leaves things open for the obvious sequel.  I read recently that the writers are already working on it.  Although, I’m sad to see the old Star Trek go, I welcome the new one with open arms.  In order for a plant to continue to live, you sometimes have to prune the dead stems.  Maybe that’s what was needed here.  If you are a purest and I tend to be one, you may walk away from this movie and say Star Trek is dead.  Some people said that when the TNG crew took over.  Some people (my brother) never followed TNG or any of the other series that followed.  They stayed loyal to the old series.  I hope they will be able to look past the death of the old universe of Star Trek and look at all the strange new worlds they will be able to visit with this “new” crew and new world of Star Trek.  Since this is a new timeline, what will the future hold?  A new version of TNGDeep Space 9?  Maybe we could see the birth of new television series.

Go see Star Trek.  It’s great fun and you’ll have a good time.  Live long and prosper my friends.


Advertisement

Comments:

You enjoyed it? So did I. But Star Trek it ain’t. I was prepared for some messing around with the continuity. But I can’t forgive them wiping out all of the previous Star Trek history apart from the Enterprise series, ironically enough. Was that really necessary? And destroying Vulcan? Home of the most interesting race in Trek and hence an absolute cornerstone of the Trek universe? I am sorry, but “rebooting” the Trek universe by “booting” TOS, TNG, DS9 and VOY points to a failure of the imagination, and a failure to respect what came before. Despicable ... I won’t be spending any more money on this new franchise, masquerading as Trek.

G. Andrew Maness G. Andrew Maness 5/23/09 9:56 pm

You nailed it.  And it doesn’t do away with anything.  The new continuity can be enjoyed on its own, but lacks a depth, warmth,  and resonance without a knowledge of the old continuity.  This is science fiction, for god’s sake:  This is the arena where this sort of audacity can be attempted, and, in this case, achieved.

astronomius astronomius 5/28/09 6:31 am

best movie i saw this year (so far).

i reviewed the film already online, so i won’t repeat much of what i said already.

i grew up with Star Trek TOS (what it’s called now), couldn’t watch many episodes during original air since it was on too late (10:00PM, the prime-time death slot !). i was a big fan a few years later, after the series was finally cancelled.

TOS has been aired so much since the past 6 years that i recently saw how cheesy many of the effects were back then; sound, lighting, makeup hold up well, but prosthetics, monster masks and suits, yecch. (some of) the acting held up, and many of the stories are still entertaining, but my big problem with the series is that the outer circle of bridge crew (Uhura, Scott, Sulu, Chekov) are still mainly functionaries and don’t quite help advance the stories…

J.J. ‘s reboot really gave me the sense that these rethought characters could do anything at any time, were much more than story tools, and may even become legendary further down the road; not because of their “names”, but because of who they are and what they do together. the chemistry is crucial with the OG 7, and the actors and director completely clicked.

so much has been said already about the familiar catchphrases (i.e., “I’m givin’ her all she’s got!”) and signature moves (i.e., Vulcan nerve pinch) written to be entirely necessary to the scenes, the crashed 1966 Corvette (“Not Your Father’s Star Trek”), buit almost nothing has been said about what was missing.

curiously, the humanistic paradigm that ST fans wore out over the years seems to have been replaced by something that re-developed over the past 20 years, and this is a kind of optimism born out of terror, hardship and opportunity. we don’t see this as much in our elected officials (because they’re buffoons) as much as with the people, but the last time we (Americans) saw this was back in WWII. this optimism has less to do with tech and more to do with the human spirit, of which both Kirk and Spock have in abundance in this film.

as a long time trekkie (i said it), this treatment of TOS is the best i’ve ever seen.

to sum it up, Leonard Nimoy on STL recently said that if the Trekkers don’t like the new movie, they’re di**heads.

astro rating: 2/2

astronomius astronomius 5/28/09 6:00 pm

by the way, i’ll probably see it a third time.


Comments: Page 1 of 1 pages

Advertisement

Post a Comment:







Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?



Advertisement